Here are some of my findings on the superflow 110 at college.
I'd be interested to see how they compare with the numbers the OP has.
7mm stem, 74mm bore adaptor, 10"H
2O
Standard AAV
Lift" Flow in CFM
0.05 12.7
0.1 27.54
0.15 39.2
0.2 46.6
0.25 55.07
0.3 58.25
0.35 61.42
0.4 62.48
Standard AAU
Lift" Flow in CFM
0.05 11.2
0.1 23.9
0.15 32
0.2 41
0.25 46.2
0.3 47.5
0.35 48.1
0.4 48.3
AAU with 36mm Valve (+2mm oversize)
Lift" Flow in CFM
0.05 13.5
0.1 29.2
0.15 37.4
0.2 47.5
0.25 51.9
0.3 52.8
0.35 54.6
0.4 55.2
AAU with some work done on the short side and bowl area.
Lift" Flow in CFM
0.05 13.5
0.1 30.4
0.15 42.8
0.2 54.3
0.25 59.5
0.3 60.6
0.35 63.5
0.4 63.9
Ported AAV
Lift" Flow in CFM
0.05 16.4
0.1 29
0.15 38
0.2 49.3
0.25 59.1
0.3 64.6
0.35 66.8
0.4 69
I managed to get 79.8 CFM (discharge coefficient of 0.90) out of this port by using plasticine to increase the radius on the short side. There isn't enough room to get a TIG torch in these ports, so welding the floor up isn't an option.
Maybe I could use a pencil torch, but I don't have one of those.
I was trying to recreate this shape in the AAU port.
With the 36mm valve in the AAU there is little flow around the back of the valve, as was clearly shown by using a flow wand.
Unfortunately I found that the casting around the back of the valve (on the long side) is thin and I was into the water jacket before I had the shape right.
Maybe I just have a thin casting, I don't know.
With a little port work the AAU flows better than the AAV at all the recorded lift points,
The velocity kicks ass as the port is that much smaller than the AAV.
If I could get the air to flow on all sides of the valve I know it'd be a really strong flowing head.
But the only option may be to fill the AAV with JB Weld or similar.