Author Topic: conection btw charger nd camshaft  (Read 3292 times)

Offline Ä‘uro

  • Members
  • *****
  • Posts: 281
conection btw charger nd camshaft
« on: June 24, 2009, 01:46:07 pm »

Just hv a Q...

I put catcam camshaft 269/269 i/o 252/276 so don't know if this can affect on charger presure ?!


Offline Robin

  • Members
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
  • 194bhp - 1341 Turbo
Re: conection btw charger nd camshaft
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2009, 08:54:49 pm »
you will see less boost pressure on your boost gauge.

Offline Ä‘uro

  • Members
  • *****
  • Posts: 281
Re: conection btw charger nd camshaft
« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2009, 01:07:22 am »
i tought it won't happen but it is.
now I hv only 0.4 bar i/o 0.8 bar

Offline Ä‘uro

  • Members
  • *****
  • Posts: 281
Re: conection btw charger nd camshaft
« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2009, 02:18:22 pm »
is it possible if I put Shrick cam inside boost will be smaller than usual? 
Let say with original cam boost is 0,8 bar nd with shrick cam is 0,6 bar?

Offline hayesey

  • Administrators
  • *****
  • Posts: 5824
  • The CV joint killer
    • ClubG40
Re: conection btw charger nd camshaft
« Reply #4 on: July 07, 2009, 02:46:59 pm »
anything that increases the airflow into and out of the head will result in a lower figure reading on a boost gauge, that's the whole idea, the engine is actually using more air rather than building up more back pressure in the inlet which is what boost gauges actually measure.

Offline Ä‘uro

  • Members
  • *****
  • Posts: 281
Re: conection btw charger nd camshaft
« Reply #5 on: July 08, 2009, 07:26:35 am »
so it's possible that I hv feeling car is going slower cos boost presure is lower but it accelerate faster?

I'm asking that cos first placed inside cat cam 269/269 nd boost was on full trottle 0.6 bar with 65mm pulley nd the feeling was: sh..t this car is not going at all.
after that remowe it nd placed standard cam in it. feeling is wuiiiiiii, till 4000 rpm car is running but after 4000 rpm car is crazy nd in sec reaches 6500 rpm. nd boost presure is 0.8 bar
Is it possible that I hv just  feeling that car is runing faster but actualy it's slower?

what is y. oppinion what to do?

I hv
65mm pulley
toothbelt conversion
GT inlet manifold ported
660 cc injectors
4-2-1 exaust
stand alone management
nd hd 269/269 cam but replace it with standard one
gasoline presure is 4 bar


Offline polo classic

  • Members
  • *****
  • Posts: 265
Re: conection btw charger nd camshaft
« Reply #6 on: July 08, 2009, 09:37:18 am »

660 cc injectors
gasoline presure is 4 bar



 :o that equals 762cc injectors at 3 bar!  ???

Why have you used soo large injectors? Thats enough for 550-600 hp!

Offline hayesey

  • Administrators
  • *****
  • Posts: 5824
  • The CV joint killer
    • ClubG40
Re: conection btw charger nd camshaft
« Reply #7 on: July 08, 2009, 09:58:45 am »
those injectors are insane! you must be getting a really poor spray pattern from them.  They are unnecessarily big.

I don't think a 269/269 cam is suitable for use with a g-lader is it?  I thought the usual cam for a g40 with the g-lader still on was something like 252/270.

Offline Ä‘uro

  • Members
  • *****
  • Posts: 281
Re: conection btw charger nd camshaft
« Reply #8 on: July 08, 2009, 11:08:50 am »
660cc Siemens Doka injectors are very good to setup nd with standalone management y. can open/close them how do y. like.
I don't hv poor spray pattern cos of bigger pressure on FPR. I hv very fine mist nd no problem at all with gasoline.

Yes Paul y're right 269/269 is not sutible for G-lader cos car become to lazy. cos of that I placed back standard one. But think to buy 252/276 or 252/282 fm SLS tuning.

Which one should be better ? Intake 252° Outlet 276° hs good performance at low revs, high top end output
and Intake 252° Outlet 282° hs very high top end performance, fast boost build-up due to low intake but don't know how will engine work stady or not....