I'm looking into getting my head ported, along with an uprated cam and Vernier pulley, at some point in the new year. And, like most things, the more I read mixed with what I've picked up over the years is confusing me.
I want to make sure this is done right. Obviously it won't now be done by PSD, so I want to make sure whoever does it is going about it the right way.
What I've always understood is that the PSD big valve heads had considerably larger exhaust valves compared to the inlet valves. I've got memories of seeing one at PSD and asking Steve, who said something along the lines of most of the porting is required on the exhaust valves.
This, to my mind, makes sense. Pressurised air in, which then combusts, means compared to a N/A engine there'll be a lot more exhaust gas to get out. I trust Steve's professional opinion on G40 engines, as I reckon there are few who know them as well as him, but having talked about this on other forums it's being questioned.
The thing which concerns me is this:
http://www.pumaracing.co.uk/Exvalve.htmMainly this paragraph:
The other commonly quoted situation is that of turbocharged and supercharged engines. Ask most people, many "professional" engine builders included I'm afraid, and they'll tell you forced induction engines need bigger exhaust valves at the expense of smaller inlet ones. Well after all it stands to sense dunnit mate? The inlet side has a thumping great turbo pushing the air in and the exhaust side has nothing extra to help it.
Utter bollocks I'm afraid and anyone who tells you this can be discounted as any sort of authority on how engines work and probably best avoided if you're looking for someone to spend your money with. When you turbocharge an engine you increase the cylinder pressure in direct proportion to the boost because you've crammed more air into it. This extra cylinder pressure directly increases the exhaust valve flow when the exhaust valve opens.
In effect everything stays in the same proportion as when the engine was normally aspirated. The turbo basically boosts the exhaust valve flow in exactly the same proportion as it boosts the inlet valve flow although the relationship, being one step removed, is too remote for most people to appreciate it. So forced induction engines actually follow exactly the same rules about exhaust valve size as normally aspirated ones.
I'm lost. Anyone care to shed any light on this? Is it a problem specific to G40s that they have exhaust valves which are too small?